翻訳と辞書 |
Edmonds v Lawson : ウィキペディア英語版 | Edmonds v Lawson
''Edmonds v Lawson'' () (EWCA Civ 69 ) is a UK labour law case regarding the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 and who is/is not included; it also considered whether a pupil barrister provides consideration to his/her master and/or chambers and whether that relationship demonstrated adequate intention. It held that pupil barristers are not included as either "apprentices" (as was held at first instance) or "workers" for the purposes of the Act but do provide adequate consideration and intention to found a contract with their chambers. ==Facts== Rebecca Jane Edmonds was doing a criminal law pupillage with Michael Lawson QC’s chambers, 23 Essex Street. She did an English degree, then a law degree, and after her BVC won an unfunded pupillage, consisting of two sets of six months with different barristers at the chambers. Sullivan J held that Miss Edmonds was a worker. The chambers appealed.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Edmonds v Lawson」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|